4 Comments

After 6 Years Of QE, And A $4.5 Trillion Balance Sheet, St. Louis Fed Admits QE Was A Mistake

After years of sounding the alarm that Fed policy was not helping the real economy but merely papering over insolvency and propping up asset prices, it appears those in the inner circles may be letting the cat out of the bag.

from zerohedge: 08/19/2015

As you’re no doubt aware, the Fed is fond of using the research departments at its various branches to validate policy and analyze away bad economic outcomes. For instance, earlier this year, the San Francisco Fed came up with an academic justification for the now infamous double seasonally adjusted GDP print – they call it “residual seasonality.” Then there’s the NY Fed, where researchers recently took to the bank’s blog to explain why, despite all evidence to the contrary, Treasury liquidity is “fairly favorable.”

Be that as it may, someone will occasionally say something really inconvenient – like when, back in April, the St. Louis Fed warned that the American Middle Class was “under more pressure than you think,” a situation the bank blamed on the diverging fortunes (literally) of the haves and the have nots in the post-crisis world. The implication – made clear in the accompanying graphics – was that QE was effectively eliminating the Middle Class.

Now, the very same St. Louis Fed (this time in the form of a white paper by the bank’s vice president Stephen D. Williamson), is out questioning the efficacy of QE when it comes to stoking inflation and boosting economic activity.

Williamson says the theory behind QE is “not well-developed”, and calls the evidence in support of Ben Bernanke’s views on the transmission mechanisms whereby asset purchases affect outcomes “mixed at best.”

“All of [the] research is problematic,” Williamson continues, as “there is no way to determine whether asset prices move in response to a QE announcement simply because of a signalling effect, whereby QE matters not because of the direct effects of the asset swaps, but because it provides information about future central bank actions with respect to the policy interest rate.” In other words, it could be that the market is just reading QE as a signal that rates will stay lower for longer and that read is what drives market behavior, not the actual bond purchases.

But the most damning critique of Bernanke’s response to the crisis is this:

 There is no work, to my knowledge, that establishes a link from QE to the ultimate goals of the Fed inflation and real economic activity. Indeed, casual evidence suggests that QE has been ineffective in increasing inflation. For example, in spite of massive central bank asset purchases in the U.S., the Fed is currently falling short of its 2% inflation target. Further, Switzerland and Japan, which have balance sheets that are much larger than that of the U.S., relative to GDP, have been experiencing very low inflation or deflation.

And then there’s this:

 A Taylor-rule central banker may be convinced that lowering the central bank’s nominal interest rate target will increase inflation. This can lead to a situation in which the central banker becomes permanently trapped in ZIRP. With the nominal interest rate at zero for a long period of time, inflation is low, and the central banker reasons that maintaining ZIRP will eventually increase the inflation rate. But this never happens and, as long as the central banker adheres to a sufficiently aggressive Taylor rule, ZIRP will continue forever, and the central bank will fall short of its inflation target indefinitely. This idea seems to fit nicely with the recent observed behavior of the worldís central banks.

And this:

 Thus, the Fed’s forward guidance experiments after the Great Recession would seem to have done more to sow confusion than to clarify the Fed’s policy rule.

So in sum, the vice President of the St. Louis Fed has taken a look around and discovered that in fact, not only have trillions in asset purchases not worked when it comes to creating “healthy” inflation and boosting growth in the US, these asset purchases haven’t worked anywhere they’ve been tried. Furthermore, he’s noticed that central bankers that adhere, in a perpetual state of Einsteinian insanity, to the Taylor principle, will never be able to raise rates and finally, he thinks that the more the Fed talks, the more confused the public gets about what it is the central bank intends to do.

We would agree on all accounts here, although when it comes to forward guidance and discerning what the Fed’s goal is, actions, as they say, speak far louder than words and with the S&P 500 having levitated some 200% since March of 2009, we don’t think anyone is truly “confused.”

St Louis Fed QE Study

• source: zerohedge.com

If you’ve had your head in the sand the previous posts below will help bring you up to speed.

Financial Repression For Dummies: What Has Really Been Going On Since The Crisis of 2008

IMF Data shows Iceland’s economy recovered after it imprisoned bankers and let banks go bust-Instead of bailing them out

Literally, Your ATM Won’t Work

The Fed Steals from Retirees and Savers

The Greatest Ponzi of All Time? THe Central Banks Are Terrified of One Thing: BONDS

Please share this, pass it along,
comment and start a conversation.

Advertisements

4 comments on “After 6 Years Of QE, And A $4.5 Trillion Balance Sheet, St. Louis Fed Admits QE Was A Mistake

  1. Most of this is beyond me, since I am a complete nitwit when it comes to the economy.

    But I have no doubt, as a human being living here, that everything, economically, has only continued to get worse for we the individuals, and that we have, as usual, been fed an elite trail of lies in regards to the economy.

    I was better off, financially, five years ago than I am today, and I am on a fixed income and so very frugal. I have no choice.

    Again, thanks for doing what you do. I will continue to spread the word, even though I may not be fully aware of every iota of the info!

    • Don’t underestimate yourself. It’s not rocket science!@#$%^ They just like to make it seem that way. We were all better off five years ago……and five years before that.. …and so on. Frogs in a pot, the water’s been getting hotter and hotter and most don’t even notice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: